Integrating Game Theory and Optimization Techniques for Conflict Resolution in Construction Project Management

Abstract

Conflicts in construction projects are inevitable due to the complexity, high stakes, and involvement of multiple stakeholders with diverse interests. This study explores the integration of game theory and optimization techniques as a novel approach to resolving conflicts in construction project management. Game theory provides a structured framework to model the strategic interactions between stakeholders, while optimization techniques ensure efficient and equitable resource allocation. The proposed methodology combines cooperative and non-cooperative game theory models with multi-objective optimization to identify Pareto-optimal solutions that balance competing interests. Case studies of real-world construction projects are analyzed to validate the effectiveness of this approach. The results demonstrate that integrating game theory with optimization techniques can enhance decision-making, minimize disputes, and foster collaboration among stakeholders, ultimately leading to improved project outcomes and reduced delays. This research provides a practical framework for construction managers to anticipate and resolve conflicts proactively, ensuring smoother project execution.